|
Labour Market Trends and Globalization's Impact on Them
EmploymentUnemployment in developed countries
For youth unemployment, see also ILO, ILO Calls for Action against Youth Unemployment and Other Forms of Social Exclusion, and for unemployment in general ILO, Combating unemployment and exclusion, The Trade Union Advisory Committee (TUAC), Employment and Development in OECD Countries, TUAC, Trade Union Statement to the 1997 OECD Meeting of Labour Ministers and to the Kobe G8 Jobs Conference, TUAC, The OECD: Challenges and Strategic Objectives Unemployment in APEC developing countries
According to ILO estimates, there are some 250 million children of ages 5-14 toiling in economic activity in developing countries. For close to one-half of them (some 120 million), this work is carried out on a full-time basis. For the remainder, it is combined with schooling or other non-economic activities. Among school children, up to one-third of the boys (33%) and more than two-fifths of the girls (42%) are engaged in economic activities on a part-time basis.
Jobs in Developed Countries
Globalization and employmentUnemployment and the loss of jobs in developed countries is quite commonly associated with globalization. The main arguments that the impact of globalization is negative are as follows:
These arguments can be found f.ex. in International Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mining and Factory Workers (ICEM), Globalization and Social Policy. See also ICFTU: The Global Market: Trade Unionism's Greatest Challenge. An opposing view, set forth for example by the IMF and the OECD, is that globalization (e.g. through foreign investment, trade, new technology and liberalization) contributes to growth, which is the key to employment. Unemployment, on the other hand, is mainly due to governments' failure to adopt sound macroeconomic and labour market policies. (See IMF, The Impact of Globalization on Workers and Their Trade Unions (http://www.imf.org) and OECD, Implementing the OECD Job Strategy) Globalization and employment was discussed comprehensively in the ILO Enterprise Forum. See f.ex., Enterprises and Jobs: Jobs in the Network Enterprise, Implication for enterprises and the ILO of a changing world economy, A business perspective on social change and human values at a time of global competition , Social initiatives by enterprises and Enterprise and jobs: Increased productivity and competitiveness. The European Union has produced a number of reports on employment and job creation. These reports focus on what has to be done in order to create more jobs - not on what went wrong. Priorities are flexibility, mobility and training. (See EU, Living and Working in the Information Society: People First, An Employment Agenda for the Year 2000 , Extraordinary European Council Meeting on Employment, November 1997, The Social and Labour Market Dimension of the Information Society , Information Society Forum Theme Paper) The Sixth ILO Survey on the Effect Given to the Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy posed the following questions on employment:
Most of the respondents considered the impact of multinationals on employment positive. Answers to these questions on employment were received from 65 countries. (See the answers of each respondent) Employment and international instruments for workers' rightsUnemployment poses a major challenge to social security. Some regulative international social security instruments exist (See Chapter: International Labour Law and ILO Convention on Maintenance of Social Security Rights). In general, however, the international labour instruments focus on the "right to work" and the rights of employed people. The content, organization and financing of unemployment benefit schemes are of national concern. In the EU as well, the international regulative dimension is restricted to EU responsibility for the coordination of national social security schemes in cases where citizens exercise their rights of free movement within the Union. The EU has produced a number of reports on modernizing the social security systems of its member states. Currently, the systems are very different. These reports conclude that social protection systems need to be adapted to the following changes in social and economic life:
In its communication "Modernizing and improving social protection in the European Union", the Commission recommends, among other things: integrating and updating tax and benefit systems with a view to increasing employment incentives; developing unemployment compensation schemes into employability insurance; narrowing the gap between total salary costs and net take-home pay for low-skill workers; increasing employment incentives and opportunities for older workers; and activating integration policies associated with minimum social benefits. (See also EU, Working on European Social Policy : A report on the Social Policy Forum and Eurostat data on social security and unemployment benefit costs in member states) Child labour is forbidden by a number of international instruments (See Chapters: International Labour Law, Codes of Conduct for Multinationals and Corporate Codes of Conduct).However, by October 1997 the ILO Minimum Age Convention had still not been ratified by a great many countries. (For ratification and obstacles to ratification, see ILO, Standard-setting policy: Ratification and promotion of fundamental ILO Conventions) Forms of workFlexible forms of work in developed countriesThe number and proportion of full-time employees with contracts of indeterminate duration has decreased constantly in developed countries since the mid-1980s. As labour markets have become more flexible, the forms of work have multiplied. Part-time workers and workers with fixed-term contracts (who are the first loops in the flexibility chain), turn into on-call and self-employed workers. International statistics on atypical forms of work do not keep up with this development.
The proportion of US workers holding contingent jobs was about unchanged
between February 1997 and February 1999, according to the United States Bureau
of Labor Statistics. Contingent workers are persons who hold jobs that are
temporary or not expected to last. Using three alternative measures,
contingent workers comprised 1.9 to 4.3 percent of total employment in February
1999. In February 1997, the estimates were not much different, ranging
from 1.9 to 4.4 percent; in February 1995, the first year the survey was
conducted, the The February 1999 survey also identified workers with alternative employment arrangements. There were 8.2 million workers (6.3 percent of the total employed) who were identified as independent contractors, 2.0 million (1.5 percent) who worked on-call, 1.2 million (0.9 percent) who worked for temporary help agencies, and 769,000 (0.6 percent) who worked for contract firms. Between February 1997 and February 1999, the proportion of workers employed as independent contractors declined, while the proportions employed in the other three alternative work arrangements were little changed. From February 1995 to February 1997, the proportions in all four categories were little changed. A worker's employment arrangement could be both contingent and alternative, since contingent work is defined separately from the four alternative employment arrangements. The proportion of workers in alternative employment arrangements who also are classified as contingent ranged from 3 percent for independent contractors to 56 percent for workers employed by temporary help agencies. The results of the February 1999 survey showed that the characteristics of workers with contingent jobs and in alternative employment arrangements were similar to those in the prior two surveys. . Under the broadest estimate, a total of 5.6 million workers held contingent jobs. These workers were more than twice as likely as noncontingent workers to be under the age of 25. Contingent workers also were somewhat more likely to be female; more than half (51 percent) of all contingent workers were women, compared with 47 percent of noncontingent workers. Young contingent workers were more likely to be students than their noncontingent counterparts. Among 16- to 24-year-olds, 66 percent of contingent workers were enrolled in school, compared with about 40 percent of noncontingent workers. (BLS, Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements) Globalization and flexible forms of workGlobalization did not give birth to flexible forms of work (See Chapter Globalization) - but it contributes to their development through the international network enterprise, which was created by globalization. The network enterprise is a unit of business operations made up of different companies or segments of companies, as well as of consultants and temporary workers attached to specific projects. Large companies rely on vast networks of suppliers, whose quality and responsibility are critical for the success of the larger company. In some cases, such as in Japan or the Republic of Korea, suppliers are generally loyal to one company. In other cases, such as in the United States, Western Europe, "Taiwan, China", China or Hong Kong, suppliers have alternative connections to different clients. The complexity of the new business system does not stop there. Large companies, particularly multinational companies, constantly set up "strategic alliances" - that is, agreements with other companies, sometimes competitors, in specific processes or product lines. These strategic alliances are limited in space (they may be country-specific), time (they are valid for a certain period only), and purpose (they may for example cover technology, but not markets - or vice versa). Since every major company uses this strategy, and all constantly change their purpose, the actual behaviour of companies is organized around a network of variable geometry. The development of the network enterprise favours a diversity of contractual arrangements between capital and labour. The number of fulltime, career-seeking, long-term salaried employees is decreasing, and the system is evolving towards a very diverse pool of workers that become part-timers, on-call workers, temporary workers, self-employed, or high-turnover workers. In the information age, a fundamental new trend in labour relations seems to be the individualization of labour conditions and labour contracts, reversing the trend towards the socialization of labour that characterized the industrial society. (Castells, Enterprises and Jobs: Jobs in the Network Enterprise. On the characteristics of each alternative worker group, see, Survey on Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements) Flexible Forms of work and international instruments for workers' rightsThere are quite many international instrument for regulating the use of atypical forms of work (See, ILO Conventions on Home Work, Part-Time Work and Private Employment Agencies and European Framework Agreement on Part-Time Work concluded between UNICE, ETUC and CEEP) However, none of these instruments - nor any international instruments on working time - cover the self-employed. The EU's Working Time Directive also excludes self-employed workers. (See, EU, White Paper on Sectors and Activities Excluded from the Working Time Directive) Actually, the entire concept of the self-employed worker remains ambiguous, and one of the reasons for the popularity of self-employment is that by hiring self-employed workers, employers are exempted from most provisions of labour legislation, especially in the field of working time legislation. Like unemployment, flexible forms of work pose a challenge to social security arrangements. Flexible forms of work lack continuity. Spans of work and unemployment alternate, as do weekly working hours. Defining the periods during which flex-workers are entitled to various benefits (e.g. to unemployment benefits), is becoming more difficult as the forms or work continue to multiply and definitions of various forms of work become blurred. Home workers resemble the self-employed, the self-employed resemble on-call workers, employees resemble entrepreneurs, etc. Compensation costs and earningsDefinitionsHourly compensation is defined as
Hourly direct pay includes all payments made directly to the worker, before payroll deductions of any kind, consisting of (a) pay for time worked (basic time and piece rates plus overtime premiums, shift differentials, other premiums and bonuses paid regularly each pay period, and cost-of-living adjustments) and (b) other direct pay (pay for time not worked (vacations, holidays, and other leave, except sick leave), seasonal or irregular bonuses and other special payments, selected social allowances, and the cost of payments in kind). Social insurance expenditures and other labor taxes includes (c) employer expenditures for legally required insurance programs and contractual and private benefit plans (retirement and disability pensions, health insurance, income guarantee insurance and sick leave, life and accident insurance, occupational injury and illness compensation, unemployment insurance, and family allowances) and, for some countries, (d) other labor taxes (other taxes on payrolls or employment (or reductions to reflect subsidies), even if they do not finance programs that directly benefit workers, because such taxes are regarded as labor costs). For consistency, compensation is measured on an hours-worked basis for every country. (For a more detailed definition, see United States Bureau of Labour Statistics, International Comparison of Hourly Compensation Costs for Production Workers in Manufacturing) Hourly compensation costs in developed and developing countries
Hourly direct pay in developed and developing countries
Pay for time worked in developed countriesUnfortunately, the BLS has no statistics on pay for time worked in developing countries. Pay for time worked includes only basic time and piece rates, plus overtime premiums, shift differentials, other regularly paid premiums and bonuses in each pay period, and cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs). Pay for time worked is measured on an hours-worked basis for each country.
Earnings of different worker groups in developed countries
Part-time workers earn much less than full-time workers, even on an hourly basis: 85% of the full-time average in Sweden, 71% in France, 69% in Spain and 60% in the UK. Most part-timers are in low-paid jobs, and most are women - 67% in Spain, 68% in France, 69% in Sweden and 81% in the UK. (Eurostat, Still a Big Pay Gap between Women and Men) According to the BLS survey, female part time workers' - that is, less than 35 hours per week - median weekly earnings were $161, approximately 35% of the median for women who worked full time. At $146, earnings for male part-time workers were about 9% lower than female part-timer's earnings. This was because more than half the male part-time workers were under 25 years old - ages where earnings tend to be low- compared to less than a third of the female part timers. (BLS, What women earned in 1998, Issues May 1999)
Compensation costs and globalizationCompensation costs are the cornerstone of arguments about the negative impact of globalization on workers' lives. According to the ICEM: "Multinationals' control over international trade and investment has enabled them to use threats to intensify inter-government and inter-worker competition and to weaken attempts at improving working conditions and benefits. There can be no doubt that freer trade means greater dislocation and displacement of workers in high-waged countries. The investment by multinational corporations in the South, or developing countries, obviously has lower labour costs as a pull factor in certain sectors (such as textiles or electronic assembly, for example) but within the framework of globalization ideology this factor has been exaggerated. Market access, tax incentives, investment stability, and environmental and social protection regimes are also of considerable importance." (ICEM, Globalization and Social Policy) Trade union organizations strongly criticize special economic zones, claiming they are characterized by low wages and abuse of workers. In an ICFTU report, export processing zones are called concentration camps. In addition, the ICFTU argues that the "Asian miracle" was largely built on the rapid growth of manufacturing industries, mainly light-assembly operations producing for export, and a steady increase in agricultural productivity. According to the ICFTU, most of the region's proliferating export processing zones have been deliberately created to prevent union organization as an incentive to investors. Foreign investors have been able to take advantage of the low pay and manual dexterity of workers. These industries have generated unprecedented employment opportunities for women, which are an escape route from rural poverty. However, working conditions are frequently long, arduous and dangerous. Few of the women keep these low-paid jobs much beyond their twenties, because employers fire those who marry and start a family. (ICFTU: The Global Market: Trade Unionism's Greatest Challenge) For trade union views of special economic zones, see also ICFTU, Behind the Wire: Anti-union repression in the export processing zones, and workers' and trade-unions experiences in export processing zones in Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, South Korea, Sri Lanka, "Taiwan, China", Thailand and Vietnam. Among developed countries, compensation costs in manufacturing have risen at comparatively modest rates in the United States and the Asian NIEs, but sharply in Japan and Europe since the middle of the 1980s, when globalization accelerated (see chapters on Globalization, Multinationals, Investment Funds, and National Framework). In textiles, apparel and leather goods, the level of compensation costs in the Asian NIEs has risen more than in the United States, and consequently is approaching the US level. The gap between Asian NIEs and Japan and Europe has become wider. In direct pay, the trends are similar. However, the data also show striking differences between the levels of compensation costs in developed and developing countries. These differences raise an important question: How are labour and businesses in the industrialized countries withstanding competition from producers with low labour costs in the age of trade liberalization? For example, why has only a single country in Sub-Saharan Africa - Mauritius - expanded its manufactured exports at a rapid rate, even though wages in Sub-Saharan Africa are among the lowest in the world? And even though the Lomé agreement allows African exporters access to the European market? One reason is that labour is not "cheap" where productivity is very low - and this is, unfortunately, the case in the vast majority of developing countries. But another major reason is that many (or perhaps most) exports from developing countries are an integral part of corporate strategies in industrialized countries, in so-called production sharing between industrial and developing countries within vertically-integrated international manufacturing industries. Much of the trade generated by regional agreements, such as in NAFTA and in special European Community tariff schedules, consists of production sharing. There are no precise statistics about production sharing, but in the early 1990s at least $800 billion of about $2.7 trillion in total world trade in manufactures (approximately 30%) consisted of some form of global production-sharing operations. Much of this was among industrial countries, but a considerable amount was between industrial and developing countries. Production sharing is one of the main reasons why foreign direct investment has been pouring into East Asia and other low-wage areas. (IFC, Emerging Economies: How Long Will The Low-Wage Advantage Last?) According to the Sixth Survey on the Effect Given to the Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, the wages paid by multinationals in developing countries are comparable or, in most cases, better than average wages or wages paid by local companies. (See the answers of the respondents) The survey also dealt with EPZs. All respondents said that national labour laws apply throughout the country, including EPZs, but many trade union representatives pointed out that they are not applied the same way in EPZs, and that multinationals pay less than is their ability to pay. (See the answers of the respondents) Wages and international instruments for workers' rightsAlmost all international labour instruments forbid discrimination. Men and women, and people of different races and national origin, should be treated equally. (See chapters on International Labour Law, Codes of Conduct for Multinationals, and Corporate Codes of Conduct.) However, the data show that wage discrimination is common in every country. Women, black people and people of Hispanic origin are paid less, even if they have the same level of education and the same job status as men and white people. There is no evidence that white men are more skilful at their jobs than rest of the population. Statistics show that the growth of firms owned by women continues to outpace overall business growth, and employment in women-owned firms with 100 or more employees has expanded six times faster than the average for the economy as a whole. Women-owned firms are also more likely to remain in business than the average firm. (For further details, see ILO, Enterprise and jobs: Job generation by micro, small and medium sized enterprises) Migration
The experience of developed and developing countries regarding immigration contrasts markedly. The annual growth rate of the international migrant stock in developed countries increased only moderately, passing from an annual 2.3% in 1965-1975 to 2.4% in 1985-1990. However, the total number of migrants in the developing countries increased ninefold over the same time frame, rising from 0.3% to 2.7%. (E/CN.9/1997/9: World demographic trends: Report of the Secretary General. See also migration tables on the countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and Caribbean, North America and Oceania in 1990)
According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), push factors of emigration have been reinforced since the 1980s, in both developing countries and the former socialist countries. (International Organization for Migration (IOM), Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Aid - An Alternative to Migration) The United Nations Commission on Population and Development estimated in its 1997 Report on World Population Monitoring, that in the European Union, the non-EU foreign labour population has risen steeply since 1988. Workers have come mostly from the former Yugoslavia and the Eastern European states, Turkey and the Maghreb. In 1993, there were 2.5 million citizens of Central and Eastern Europe in European Union countries. In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, political changes have led to a decline in the number of foreign workers. The former Czechoslovakia imported foreign workers from Vietnam, Angola, Mongolia and Poland. The numbers of these workers hovered around 100,000 until 1990. The number of foreign workers had declined to less than 15,000 in mid-1992. In Hungary, where it was estimated that there were some 50,000 illegal workers in 1992, some 50,000 work permits have been issued annually for jobs that are not being filled by nationals. In the Russian Federation, it is estimated that between 300,000 and 500,000 foreigners, mainly from the former Soviet republics and China, are either employed illegally or are in transit to other destinations. In Australia, Canada and the United States, policy changes have led to the opening of more doors to people whose skills or know-how are considered in short supply in the labour market and to those who can contribute to the development of science and technology. These include professionals and persons of exceptional ability, and those able to bring in capital. In the United States, the Immigration Act of 1990 led to a near-tripling of the share of employment-based visas issued each year, from 54,000 to 140,000. (See the selection of nonimmigrant and immigrant visas in United States) Nor does Canada's immigration policy, as reflected in past levels of intake of temporary workers and labour-force immigrants, suggest a trend towards growing restrictiveness. From a level of 115,500 in 1981, the aggregate number of temporary and immigrant workers admitted into the country rose to 347,800 in 1990. (The United Nations Commission on Population and Development, 1997 Report on World Population Monitoring.) According to the ILO, the number of non-immigrant work visas in the United States grew by 4% annually, from 340,000 in 1990 to 413,000 in 1995. If business workers providing temporary services for their country or company were included in the migration figures, the number of working, non-immigrant arrivals would have climbed from 3 million to 3.6 million. In Canada, the number of temporary worker visas issued has quadrupled over the past decade. The average annual inflow of temporary workers into Canada was two and one-half times larger than the number of permanent immigrants, with 234,000 temporary workers compared to 114,000 immigrant workers. Much the same pattern prevails in Australia. Throughout the Pacific Rim, which is a relatively new destination for migrants, there are hardly any permanent migration-for-work schemes. In the early 1990s, Japan established an elaborate system of more temporary openings for highly qualified foreigners and persons of Japanese descent, plus training-with-employment schemes for people from less developed countries in the region. (ILO, Private Employment Agencies Send Millions Overseas to Work. See also: ILO, Report of the Tripartite Meeting of Experts on Future ILO Activities in the Field of Migration) Migration and globalizationAs the United Nations Commission on Population and Development says in its report, despite the growing importance of international migration, the statistics needed to characterize migration flows and monitor changes over time are often lacking. There is not enough data to document the link between migration and globalization, but there are a number of suggestions. Two main ideas are that globalization decreases migration, and that globalization increases migration of well-educated people from developing countries to developed countries. When the monitoring of views and perceptions towards migration first began in 1976, international migration was a topic of secondary concern for many governments. Only a minority of governments had explicit policies with respect to intervening in migration levels. Many more governments now consider migration and its consequences to be significant for their countries. By 1995, 40% of countries had developed policies to raise or lower immigration, and 24% to raise or lower emigration. In 1976, only 6% of governments viewed immigration as too high, but this percentage rose to 13% in 1980 and reached 19% in 1983. Governments' perceptions of both immigration and emigration levels have shown remarkably little change since 1983. On the other hand, the number of governments adopting measures to control or reduce these flows kept growing until recently. The percentage of countries with policies to lower immigration steadily increased, from 6% in 1976 to 19% in 1986 - it then jumped to 32% by 1989 and reached 35% by 1993. In 1995, the percentage stood at 33%. A reversal occurred after 1989 with respect to emigration policies. The percentage of countries seeking to lower emigration, which had increased from 13% to 25% between 1976 and 1989, fell to 20% in 1993. Developed countries showed the strongest inclination towards restricting immigration, but developing countries are following the same trend. Currently, only a small number of countries admit a significant number of immigrants for permanent settlement - chiefly Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. Policies for permanent settlement in these countries increasingly put a greater emphasis on migrant skills. (United Nations Commission on Population and Development, Report on World Population Monitoring 1997) The UNCTAD/IOM study Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Aid - An Alternative to Migration finds that increased flows of FDI and trade, as well as more effective use of development aid, impact directly and indirectly on migration. Foreign direct investment contributes directly to a reduction of migration by creating jobs in foreign affiliates and, through an array of forward and backward linkages, in the host economies as a whole. Indirectly, FDI contributes to economic development by bringing technology and organizational and managerial know-how, and by providing the investing country with access to markets. FDI can thus generate a sense of hope among potential migrants for a better economic future in countries with insufficient capital but abundant labour. Such countries can also increase exports by making dynamic use of the comparative advantage of their low-cost labour. Trade tends to reduce migration through the creation of additional employment and accelerated economic growth in exporting countries. The increased tradability of skill- and knowledge-intensive services opens up new opportunities for high-wage jobs in the migrant-sending countries, and can be expected to induce skilled workers to stay in their home country. A recent survey of IOM: Gains from Global Linkages: Trade in Services and Movements of Persons concludes that greater emphasis by developing countries on accelerated development of the modern services industries and their increased participation in world trade in services through freer temporary movement of service-providing persons hold enormous potential for creating new and better jobs and raising incomes in these countries. If these linkages are used wisely, they could reduce pressures for disruptive migration and help in better management of international migration. This message is contained in a new study just released by the IOM in Geneva, prepared by the organization's senior consultant, Professor Bimal Ghosh. The study shows, by way of illustration, that developing countries could over time create between 6 and 30 million new jobs and an additional export income of $210 billion, by competing in the world market only for those skill- and knowledge-intensive services for which they have a comparative advantage and which can be delivered mainly through telecommunications systems. |
|